Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Dearly Departed (Cinema vs Theatre)


There are many differences in seeing a theatrical play as opposed to a film. First of all the environment is completely different. No matter what kind of play you see, it still feels like a higher form of art than seeing a movie, whether it is casual or not. Even seeing something like Dearly Departed, where the audience was in jeans and t-shirts, you still feel like you are in a more creative, educated setting. Especially because only select people who have a passion for the arts and plays, are the ones who usually go to theatrical performances, where as a movie is something everyone and their mother goes to all the time.
Watching actors live is a completely different feeling than seeing them on TV, just as listening to a CD is different than going to a concert. You can feel their energy and their presence from the stage, which makes the experience more personal. In film it is only a 2-D experience and they seem like they are in a different world because they are not physically there. Where as in theatre it is very personal, and you can sometimes even be part of the action. Like in Dearly Departed when they had the church service scene, where you clapped along; or during the end when they referred to the audience as the guests at the funeral.
 If an actor sucks it reflects your view of the play as well. In Dearly Departed everyone was really great. They had lots of energy and covered their mess ups well (except the laughing when Delightful got the cheese whiz all over her face on accidentJ). The pantomiming was awesome, especially with all the little sounds (I know that’s hard to do). In a movie you always have sets and props to complete your surroundings. In a movie you don’t see mess ups unless it is shot live, or has a blooper reel; they retake the scenes until they are perfect. You also get to see whatever you want to see in a play. For instance, there were times that I was watching Delightful eat her food instead of the conversation going on just because she did such a hilarious job staying so serious and stupid while she ate. A movie restricts you to what the director wants to show you. Transition from scene to scene is also very different. In a play it is usually a black out accompanied by music or something, which they used in Dearly Departed. In a movie they use slide transitions or fades- they have like a bazillion choices.
One thing I noticed that they did in Dearly Departed, that they do in movies was that the scenes individually showed what each group of people was doing instead of having them freeze or something in the background.
Theatre etiquette is also different from a movie. In a theatre people won’t be talking, generally, in the middle of the play. Like when you scream at the girl about to die in a horror movie, which really wouldn’t happen in a theatre piece. Another thing is people don’t eat during a theatre piece (mostly because you are not allowed to) but its tradition in a movie to have popcorn or candy. You also wouldn’t just walk out on a play, usually, like people do for bad movies because you would offend the actors, when a movie they won’t ever know. Also people clap in between scenes sometimes, which you wouldn’t do at a movie. But if it’s a movie premier there is clapping at the end, like in a play.
So plays are pretty much live action movies, but it puts you at the scene too. There’s a lot that differs the two forms from each other, but they are both art. Dearly Departed was hilarious, I enjoyed it a lot. It was uniquely set up too, having so much pantomime and little props. It was cool because it was something that would really happen, but it was missing normal elements so you still knew you were watching a play. I would recommend it, it looked like lots of fun!

Monday, November 1, 2010

Anna and the Tropics

Play Analysis

Anna and the Tropics is a melodramatic production. It doesn't end the way you want it to end but it ends realistically. There is really conflict between all the characters in Anna  but if I had to choose the biggest one, it would be between Jaun (the lector) and Cheche (Santiago's brother). Jaun could represent traditon and Cheche modernization but that's just a really obvious representation. I think the turning point is when they have the part for the new cigar because at that point you can tell everything is starting to go downhill.The climax is when the lector gets shot by Cheche. Everyone goes into shock and depression and Cheche disappears from that moment on. The resolution is when Palomo picks up the book to continue the tradition and make amends with the other conflict in the story between him and Conchita but there really feels like there isn't a complete resolution and you're left to just think about the ending. Jaun was reading Anna to the workers when Cheche came in drunk and shot him. Jaun dieing represents that traditon is over thrown by modernization, and Cheche disappearing for the rest of the story is a representation of not knowing what will happen in the future. Jaun just anted to carry out tradition, his father and his father's father were lectors. He wanted things to stay the same and where they were. Cheche wanted progress, to move on and move forward which The subject of Anna and the Tropics is progress. It's trying to convey that although we have to have modernization to survive we can still have a balance of tradition and if we dont have eaquality in the two one will die, and it will most likely be tradition. Things are always moving forward and we have to move with them.